Astounding Flaws in Bolton’s INF Op-Ed

So I finally got to read “An Obsolete Nuclear Treaty Even Before Russia Cheated,” John Bolton and John Yoo, WSJ, 09.10.14, and I can't help pointing out the following flaws:
The authors write: "Russia has extensively tested a new ballistic missile, the RS-26 Rubezh, which violates the INF." A number of respected US and Russian experts have argued that RS-26 doesn’t violate INF – it is an ICBM, which was test-fired to a shorter range and INF doesn’t prohibit that. In fact, USG concerns are centered on a cruis missile R-500.  It is fine to mention RS-26, as this as a debated subject, but it is astounding that the authors don’t even mention that central concern in their oped.
The authors also write: "Despite the country's demographic and economic decline, Moscow also is overhauling its nuclear and conventional arsenal, adding new, multiple-warhead ballistic missiles, and suspending the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty." Russia’s population and economy have been growing since 2010 and 2009 respectively.
You would think former U.S. ambassador to UN and law professor at the University of California at Berkeley would do their homework before writing an oped, but apparently it is not required as long they advance the 'party line.'

Population of Countries in Millions (source: World Bank)
Country 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Russia 143.8 143.1 142.4 142.1 141.9 141.9 142.3 142.9 143.1 143.4

GDP

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s